Olli, Eero: Cultural Theory Specified - The Coherent, Sequential,
and Synthetic Individual Approaches. 1995 Unpublished Masters thesis,
University of Bergen, Bergen, 236 pages.
Abstract:
Within cultural theory there exists an internal debate about the relationship
between the individual and culture. I take my starting point in this
unclear relation between the individual and culture, and present three
interpretations of cultural theory: The Coherent Individual, The Sequential
Individual and The Synthetic Individual Approaches. These three interpretations
differ in the way individuals' cultural biases are affected by context,
and in the way rejection of a cultural bias is treated. In the second
chapter I present my research design and the survey I use as data material,
develop an apparatus of measurement for cultural biases and examine
their reliability and validity. In each of the three following chapters,
I run an analysis of individuals' party preferences based on the different
specifications (i.e., Coherent, Sequential, and Synthetic) of the relation
between individual and culture. Theoretical assumptions and expectations
constrain the analyses in different ways; therefore, none of the analyses
alone can answer all of the questions, and, further, each specification
must be evaluated on its own premises. To examine each of these specifications,
it is necessary to use statistical analyses that resemble the structure
of the current specification in order to see if the preferences could
have been created by the mechanisms described by this version of the
theory. The final chapter is a systematic comparison of the three analyses.
The empirical results indicate that individuals often support more than
just one cultural bias, and that rejection of a cultural bias has an
effect on individuals' party preference. Cultural theory, interpreted
as the Synthetic Individual Approach, proved to be a powerfull tool
for prediction of party preferences.
The layout is ugly, and done when I did not know better. However, I have chosen to keep it as close to the original as possible, to ensure that the page numbers do not differ between the PDF and the approved masters thesis.
Strictly speaking this is not a masters thesis, as it is a hovedfagsoppgave which is more independent and larger piece of research than is expected at the masters level.